HURA
Global X Uranium Index ETF

Full HURA fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HURA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, Financials, and Industrials, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HURA features a management fee (MER) of 0.99%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, HURA has returned 18.28% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 13.31% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HURA
+5.48%+2.36%+18.28%+106.25%+181.11%
HEWB
+8.78%+10.95%+13.31%+63.09%+117.70%
Flows
HURA
+$5 M+$6 M+$31 M+$51 M+$68 M
HEWB
+$8 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

HURA vs HEWB exposure

Countries

HURA
Canada
49.03%
USA
34.14%
Other
16.83%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

HURA
Energy
48.04%
Other
29.11%
Financials
15.35%
Industrials
7.14%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HURA
CAMECO
21.63%
US63253R2013
16.59%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
15.35%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.35%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.23%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.35%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.63%
CGN MINING
3.07%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.81%
DENISON MINES
2.61%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.62%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
HURA
HEWB
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.07%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 16, 2019January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about HURA and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HURA or HEWB?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA has returned 18.28% year to date, while HEWB has returned 13.31%. HURA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HURA or HEWB?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA manages $206.31 M in assets, while HEWB manages $285.91 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HURA and HEWB managed?
HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HURA and HEWB emphasize?
HURA is most exposed to Energy, Financials, and Industrials. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HURA or HEWB?
Year to date, HURA has seen +$31.05 M in net flows, compared with +$12.19 M for HEWB. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HURA and HEWB compare?
HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HURA and HEWB?
HURA's largest holdings include CAMECO and SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HURA or HEWB?
HURA holds 28 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, HURA is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HURA and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds