HURA
Global X Uranium Index ETF

Full HURA fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HURA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, Financials, and Industrials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, HURA features a management fee (MER) of 0.99%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HURA has returned 18.28% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 13.33% with -$1,114 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HURA
+5.48%+2.36%+18.28%+106.25%+181.11%
ZEB
+8.76%+10.94%+13.33%+63.23%+117.91%
Flows
HURA
+$5 M+$6 M+$31 M+$51 M+$68 M
ZEB
-$403 M-$987 M-$1,114 M-$1,769 M-$1,596 M

HURA vs ZEB exposure

Countries

HURA
Canada
49.03%
USA
34.14%
Other
16.83%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

HURA
Energy
48.04%
Other
29.11%
Financials
15.35%
Industrials
7.14%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HURA
CAMECO
21.63%
US63253R2013
16.59%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
15.35%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.35%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.23%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.35%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.63%
CGN MINING
3.07%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.81%
DENISON MINES
2.61%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%

Diversification

HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.62%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
HURA
ZEB
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.07%2.66%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 16, 2019October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about HURA and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HURA or ZEB?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA has returned 18.28% year to date, while ZEB has returned 13.33%. HURA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HURA or ZEB?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA manages $206.31 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.08 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HURA and ZEB managed?
HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HURA and ZEB emphasize?
HURA is most exposed to Energy, Financials, and Industrials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HURA or ZEB?
Year to date, HURA has seen +$31.05 M in net flows, compared with -$1,113.95 M for ZEB. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HURA and ZEB compare?
HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of HURA and ZEB?
HURA's largest holdings include CAMECO and SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HURA or ZEB?
HURA holds 28 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, HURA is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HURA and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds