VS
Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that HURA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, Financials, and Industrials, while ZUT leans towards Utilities. When evaluating costs, HURA features a management fee (MER) of 0.99%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, HURA has returned 18.28% year-to-date with +$31 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 16.04% with -$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HURA
ZUT
| AuM | $206.31 M | $878.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.99% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.98% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.72% | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HURA | +5.48% | +2.36% | +18.28% | +106.25% | +181.11% |
ZUT | -1.07% | +11.80% | +16.04% | +30.12% | +38.53% | |
| Flows | HURA | +$5 M | +$6 M | +$31 M | +$51 M | +$68 M |
ZUT | +$25 M | -$31 M | -$60 M | +$128 M | +$313 M |
HURA vs ZUT exposure
Countries
HURA
Canada
49.03%
USA
34.14%
Other
16.83%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%
Sectors
HURA
Energy
48.04%
Other
29.11%
Financials
15.35%
Industrials
7.14%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HURA
CAMECO
21.63%
US63253R2013
16.59%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
15.35%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.35%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.23%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.35%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.63%
CGN MINING
3.07%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.81%
DENISON MINES
2.61%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%
Diversification
HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.62%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%
Characteristics
Compare
HURA
ZUT
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.07% | 2.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 16, 2019 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about HURA and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HURA or ZUT?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA has returned 18.28% year to date, while ZUT has returned 16.04%. HURA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HURA or ZUT?
As of May 5, 2026, HURA manages $206.31 M in assets, while ZUT manages $878.41 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HURA and ZUT managed?
HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HURA and ZUT emphasize?
HURA is most exposed to Energy, Financials, and Industrials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HURA or ZUT?
Year to date, HURA has seen +$31.05 M in net flows, compared with -$60.16 M for ZUT. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HURA and ZUT compare?
HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of HURA and ZUT?
HURA's largest holdings include CAMECO and SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: HURA or ZUT?
HURA holds 28 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, HURA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HURA and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.