HXQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HXQ fund page
VS
QUU
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF

Full QUU fund page

Compare Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ) vs Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HXQ provides Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare exposures, while QUU is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, HXQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, HXQ has returned 21.28% year-to-date with +$324 M in net flows, whereas QUU is at 16.35% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
HXQ
-1.87%+2.06%+21.28%+19.43%+111.75%
QUU
-0.58%+3.79%+16.35%+15.65%+95.24%
Flows
HXQ
+$84 M+$131 M+$324 M+$360 M+$504 M
QUU
+$318 M+$943 M+$1,570 M+$1,886 M+$2,584 M

HXQ vs QUU exposure

Countries

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
USA
97.64%

Sectors

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Technology
45.27%
Finance
13.23%
Healthcare
9.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.71%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
15.80%
As of October 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.73%
Apple, Inc.
6.83%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%

Diversification

HXQ
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.31%

Characteristics

Compare
HXQ
QUU
ProviderGlobal XMackenzie Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USDSolactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD
Replication MethodIndirectDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 19, 2016January 24, 2018

Frequently asked questions about HXQ and QUU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: HXQ or QUU?
As of October 20, 2026, HXQ has returned 21.28% year to date, while QUU has returned 16.35%. HXQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HXQ or QUU?
As of October 20, 2026, HXQ manages $1.95 B in assets, while QUU manages $7.36 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HXQ and QUU managed?
HXQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HXQ and QUU emphasize?
HXQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QUU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HXQ or QUU?
Year to date, HXQ has seen +$324.49 M in net flows, compared with +$1,569.98 M for QUU. QUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HXQ and QUU compare?
HXQ has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of HXQ and QUU?
HXQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. QUU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: HXQ or QUU?
HXQ holds 101 securities, while QUU holds 498. On holdings count, QUU is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about HXQ and QUU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds