IBIT.U
iShares Bitcoin ETF

Full IBIT.U fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, IBIT.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.32%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, IBIT.U has returned 6.79% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 28.49% with -$485 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
IBIT.U
-5.53%+25.48%-6.79%-26.46%-
HBNK
-3.80%-3.19%+28.49%+43.29%+170.31%
Flows
IBIT.U
+$0 M+$0 M+$4 M+$1 M+$0 M
HBNK
-$1 M-$23 M-$485 M-$531 M-$199 M

IBIT.U vs HBNK exposure

Countries

IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.74%

Sectors

IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.74%
As of October 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.21%
Bank of Montreal
16.52%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.70%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%

Diversification

IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.74%

Characteristics

Compare
IBIT.U
HBNK
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.70%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 10, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about IBIT.U and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: IBIT.U or HBNK?
As of October 19, 2026, IBIT.U has returned -6.79% year to date, while HBNK has returned 28.49%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IBIT.U or HBNK?
As of October 19, 2026, IBIT.U manages $15.13 M in assets, while HBNK manages $736.86 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IBIT.U and HBNK managed?
IBIT.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IBIT.U or HBNK?
Year to date, IBIT.U has seen +$4.46 M in net flows, compared with -$484.51 M for HBNK. IBIT.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IBIT.U and HBNK compare?
IBIT.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about IBIT.U and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds