VS
When evaluating costs, IGB features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.08% for ZAG. Performance-wise, IGB has returned 1.08% year-to-date with +$188 M in net flows, whereas ZAG is at 1.62% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IGB
ZAG
| AuM | $472.35 M | $13,650.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.57% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGB | +1.81% | -1.54% | -1.08% | -0.72% | +19.22% |
ZAG | +2.06% | +0.76% | +1.62% | +0.39% | +14.99% | |
| Flows | IGB | -$31 M | +$45 M | +$188 M | +$220 M | +$433 M |
ZAG | +$368 M | +$399 M | +$1,608 M | +$2,163 M | +$7,679 M |
IGB vs ZAG exposure
Countries
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada
95.65%
Sectors
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Sovereign
34.55%
Municipal
30.80%
Finance
11.12%
Government Agencies
9.39%
Other
14.14%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
4.26%
Canada, Bonds 2.5% 1nov2027, CAD
3.74%
Canada, Bonds 2.25% 1feb2028, CAD
2.97%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
2.92%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1dec2055, CAD
2.80%
Canada Housing Trust, 1.1% 15mar2031, CAD (95)
2.69%
Province of Quebec, 3.5% 1dec2048, CAD (B117)
2.35%
Bank of Montreal, 3.19% 1mar2028, CAD
2.25%
Province of Quebec, 2.75% 1sep2028, CAD (B124)
2.23%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD
2.20%
Diversification
IGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 86 total
28.40%
Characteristics
Compare
IGB
ZAG
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.98% | 3.42% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 18, 2013 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about IGB and ZAG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IGB or ZAG?
As of November 5, 2026, IGB has returned -1.08% year to date, while ZAG has returned 1.62%. ZAG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IGB or ZAG?
As of November 5, 2026, IGB manages $472.35 M in assets, while ZAG manages $13.65 B. ZAG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IGB and ZAG managed?
IGB is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZAG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IGB or ZAG?
Year to date, IGB has seen +$188.15 M in net flows, compared with +$1,608.48 M for ZAG. ZAG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IGB and ZAG compare?
IGB has an expense ratio of 0.57%, while ZAG has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about IGB and ZAG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.