VS
When evaluating costs, IGET.F features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.89% for HLIT. Performance-wise, IGET.F has returned 28.22% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HLIT is at 33.73% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
IGET.F
HLIT
| AuM | $1.15 M | $25.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.89% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.89% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.73% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGET.F | +12.67% | +18.85% | +28.22% | +63.56% | - |
HLIT | +21.77% | +19.54% | +33.73% | +144.30% | -13.41% | |
| Flows | IGET.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | - |
HLIT | -$5 M | -$3 M | -$1 M | -$13 M | -$3 M |
IGET.F vs HLIT exposure
Countries
IGET.F
Other
25.55%
USA
25.29%
Germany
8.93%
Ireland
7.25%
Canada
7.13%
Other
25.85%
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
IGET.F
Other
41.86%
Utilities
21.20%
Industrials
13.75%
Materials
9.86%
Information Technology
8.21%
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of May 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
IGET.F
CASHJPY00000
6.26%
TESLA
5.07%
US36828A1016
4.27%
IE000S9YS762
4.06%
ENGIE
3.64%
NEXTERA ENERGY
3.63%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
3.54%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
3.53%
QUANTA SERVICES
3.40%
IBERDROLA SA
3.21%
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
IGET.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
40.61%
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
IGET.F
HLIT
| Provider | Invesco | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Global Energy Transition hedged NTR Index - CAD | Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 20.27% | 0.09% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2023 | June 23, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about IGET.F and HLIT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: IGET.F or HLIT?
As of May 4, 2026, IGET.F has returned 28.22% year to date, while HLIT has returned 33.73%. HLIT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: IGET.F or HLIT?
As of May 4, 2026, IGET.F manages $1.15 M in assets, while HLIT manages $25.48 M. HLIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are IGET.F and HLIT managed?
IGET.F is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the Morningstar Global Energy Transition hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark. HLIT is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: IGET.F or HLIT?
Year to date, IGET.F has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$1.37 M for HLIT. IGET.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of IGET.F and HLIT compare?
IGET.F has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while HLIT has an expense ratio of 0.89%.
Recent articles about IGET.F and HLIT
3 Critical Minerals ETFs to Watch for Under Trump 2.0
ETFs that could potentially benefit from the growing demand for critical minerals.
Posted on 12/12/2024 by Kyle Anthony inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.