VS
When evaluating costs, LEAD.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, LEAD.U has returned 2.05% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 17.23% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
LEAD.U
XEQT
| AuM | $2.47 M | $23,552.40 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.97% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LEAD.U | +3.47% | +9.61% | +2.05% | -6.47% | +51.67% |
XEQT | +2.41% | +2.30% | +17.23% | +19.09% | +89.04% | |
| Flows | LEAD.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$3 M |
XEQT | +$957 M | +$2,939 M | +$8,848 M | +$10,149 M | +$16,630 M |
LEAD.U vs XEQT exposure
Countries
LEAD.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
LEAD.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
LEAD.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
LEAD.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
LEAD.U
XEQT
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.72% | 1.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 14, 2020 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about LEAD.U and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: LEAD.U or XEQT?
As of October 8, 2026, LEAD.U has returned 2.05% year to date, while XEQT has returned 17.23%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: LEAD.U or XEQT?
As of October 8, 2026, LEAD.U manages $2.47 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.55 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are LEAD.U and XEQT managed?
LEAD.U is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: LEAD.U or XEQT?
Year to date, LEAD.U has seen -$1.48 M in net flows, compared with +$8,847.56 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of LEAD.U and XEQT compare?
LEAD.U has an expense ratio of 0.97%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about LEAD.U and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.