VS
When evaluating costs, MINN features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, MINN has returned 34.94% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.3% with +$566 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MINN
ZSP
| AuM | $116.86 M | $23,784.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.40% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MINN | -0.89% | +27.36% | +34.94% | +45.20% | +138.89% |
ZSP | +1.90% | +12.40% | +10.30% | +26.61% | +83.75% | |
| Flows | MINN | +$2 M | -$5 M | -$4 M | -$11 M | -$61 M |
ZSP | +$89 M | +$283 M | +$566 M | +$1,532 M | +$5,079 M |
MINN vs ZSP exposure
Countries
MINN
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%
Sectors
MINN
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MINN
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
Diversification
MINN
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%
Characteristics
Compare
MINN
ZSP
| Provider | Middlefield | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.25% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2018 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about MINN and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MINN or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, MINN has returned 34.94% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.30%. MINN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MINN or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, MINN manages $116.86 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.78 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MINN and ZSP managed?
MINN is actively managed by Middlefield. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MINN or ZSP?
Year to date, MINN has seen -$4.49 M in net flows, compared with +$565.61 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MINN and ZSP compare?
MINN has an expense ratio of 1.40%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about MINN and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.