VS
When evaluating costs, PFLS features a management fee (MER) of 0.95%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, PFLS has returned 6.46% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 30.16% with +$575 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PFLS
ZEB
| AuM | $147.26 M | $7,453.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.95% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 6.48% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PFLS | -2.78% | -1.71% | +6.46% | +9.90% | +45.18% |
ZEB | -4.56% | +3.59% | +30.16% | +49.54% | +153.84% | |
| Flows | PFLS | +$1 M | +$13 M | -$2 M | -$8 M | +$61 M |
ZEB | +$318 M | +$1,709 M | +$575 M | +$1,343 M | -$329 M |
PFLS vs ZEB exposure
Countries
PFLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
PFLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PFLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
PFLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
PFLS
ZEB
| Provider | Picton Mahoney | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 15, 2020 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about PFLS and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PFLS or ZEB?
As of September 14, 2026, PFLS has returned 6.46% year to date, while ZEB has returned 30.16%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PFLS or ZEB?
As of September 14, 2026, PFLS manages $147.26 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.45 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PFLS and ZEB managed?
PFLS is actively managed by Picton Mahoney. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PFLS or ZEB?
Year to date, PFLS has seen -$1.88 M in net flows, compared with +$575.36 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PFLS and ZEB compare?
PFLS has an expense ratio of 6.48%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about PFLS and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.