VS
When evaluating costs, PHW features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.6% for BANK. Performance-wise, PHW has returned 11.9% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas BANK is at 34.19% with +$334 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PHW
BANK
| AuM | $2.05 M | $1,340.62 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.83% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHW | +0.57% | -0.88% | +11.90% | +10.26% | +43.74% |
BANK | +4.84% | +1.85% | +34.19% | +46.34% | +120.56% | |
| Flows | PHW | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$3 M |
BANK | +$0 M | +$62 M | +$334 M | +$394 M | +$929 M |
PHW vs BANK exposure
Countries
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
PHW
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
PHW
BANK
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.23% | 13.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 22, 2015 | February 1, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about PHW and BANK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PHW or BANK?
As of November 11, 2026, PHW has returned 11.90% year to date, while BANK has returned 34.19%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PHW or BANK?
As of November 11, 2026, PHW manages $2.05 M in assets, while BANK manages $1.34 B. BANK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PHW and BANK managed?
PHW is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PHW or BANK?
Year to date, PHW has seen -$3.83 M in net flows, compared with +$333.76 M for BANK. BANK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PHW and BANK compare?
PHW has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%.
Recent articles about PHW and BANK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.