VS
When evaluating costs, PSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.28% for ZMMK. Performance-wise, PSA has returned 1.86% year-to-date with +$230 M in net flows, whereas ZMMK is at 2% with +$616 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PSA
ZMMK
| AuM | $3,434.64 M | $6,292.74 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.13% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSA | +0.19% | +0.56% | +1.86% | +2.20% | +10.16% |
ZMMK | +0.20% | +0.60% | +2.00% | +2.37% | +10.81% | |
| Flows | PSA | +$102 M | +$267 M | +$230 M | +$145 M | -$574 M |
ZMMK | +$206 M | +$475 M | +$616 M | +$1,169 M | +$5,123 M |
PSA vs ZMMK exposure
Countries
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
PSA
ZMMK
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.17% | 2.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 10, 2013 | December 1, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about PSA and ZMMK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PSA or ZMMK?
As of November 5, 2026, PSA has returned 1.86% year to date, while ZMMK has returned 2.00%. ZMMK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PSA or ZMMK?
As of November 5, 2026, PSA manages $3.43 B in assets, while ZMMK manages $6.29 B. ZMMK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PSA and ZMMK managed?
PSA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZMMK is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PSA or ZMMK?
Year to date, PSA has seen +$229.80 M in net flows, compared with +$616.29 M for ZMMK. ZMMK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PSA and ZMMK compare?
PSA has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZMMK has an expense ratio of 0.13%.
Recent articles about PSA and ZMMK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.