VS
When evaluating costs, QBTL features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.6% for BANK. Performance-wise, QBTL has returned 12.22% year-to-date with -$108 M in net flows, whereas BANK is at 34.78% with +$309 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QBTL
BANK
| AuM | $214.64 M | $1,339.25 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.55% | 0.83% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QBTL | +6.52% | +0.50% | -12.22% | -11.47% | -33.76% |
BANK | +3.81% | +3.65% | +34.78% | +48.18% | +134.07% | |
| Flows | QBTL | -$92 M | -$119 M | -$108 M | -$96 M | -$29 M |
BANK | +$12 M | +$67 M | +$309 M | +$387 M | +$912 M |
QBTL vs BANK exposure
Countries
QBTL
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
QBTL
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QBTL
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
QBTL
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
QBTL
BANK
| Provider | AGF | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 12.26% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 7, 2019 | February 1, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about QBTL and BANK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QBTL or BANK?
As of October 29, 2026, QBTL has returned -12.22% year to date, while BANK has returned 34.78%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QBTL or BANK?
As of October 29, 2026, QBTL manages $214.64 M in assets, while BANK manages $1.34 B. BANK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QBTL and BANK managed?
QBTL is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QBTL or BANK?
Year to date, QBTL has seen -$107.54 M in net flows, compared with +$309.17 M for BANK. BANK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QBTL and BANK compare?
QBTL has an expense ratio of 0.55%, while BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%.
Recent articles about QBTL and BANK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.