VS
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while XIC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, QCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, QCH has returned 7.92% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 11.19% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QCH
XIC
| AuM | $31.99 M | $30,257.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCH | -1.82% | +5.41% | +7.92% | +34.17% | +43.94% |
XIC | +2.09% | +6.97% | +11.19% | +34.35% | +90.68% | |
| Flows | QCH | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
XIC | +$420 M | +$2,784 M | +$5,677 M | +$7,745 M | +$11,716 M |
QCH vs XIC exposure
Countries
QCH
China
100.00%
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
QCH
Information Technology
23.68%
Financials
20.37%
Industrials
17.46%
Materials
10.68%
Consumer Staples
7.68%
Other
20.14%
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QCH
AMPEREX TECH
4.57%
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT
3.81%
MOUTAI
3.50%
CN PING AN
2.38%
ZIJIN MINING
2.18%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC
2.09%
MERCHANTS BANK
1.88%
MIDEA GROUP
1.54%
LUXSHARE
1.31%
YANGTZE POWER
1.29%
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%
Diversification
QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 285 total
24.55%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%
Characteristics
Compare
QCH
XIC
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CSI 300 Index - CNY | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.22% | 2.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about QCH and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QCH or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH has returned 7.92% year to date, while XIC has returned 11.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QCH or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH manages $31.99 M in assets, while XIC manages $30.26 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QCH and XIC managed?
QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QCH and XIC emphasize?
QCH is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. XIC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QCH or XIC?
Year to date, QCH has seen +$1.73 M in net flows, compared with +$5,676.75 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QCH and XIC compare?
QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of QCH and XIC?
QCH's largest holdings include AMPEREX TECH, ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT, and MOUTAI. XIC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCH or XIC?
QCH holds 273 securities, while XIC holds 193. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QCH and XIC
China’s Market Surge: ETFs Offering Exposure to the Rally
AI breakthroughs and new policy reforms are powering a sharp rally in Chinese equities.
Posted on 8/29/2025 by Kyle Anthony inChina
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.