VS
Mackenzie China A-Shares CSI 300 Index ETF (QCH) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, QCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, QCH has returned 7.92% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 25.29% with -$1,134 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QCH
ZEB
| AuM | $31.99 M | $5,581.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QCH | -1.82% | +5.41% | +7.92% | +34.17% | +43.94% |
ZEB | +8.46% | +23.65% | +25.29% | +67.84% | +147.83% | |
| Flows | QCH | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
ZEB | -$103 M | -$237 M | -$1,134 M | -$935 M | -$1,914 M |
QCH vs ZEB exposure
Countries
QCH
China
100.00%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
QCH
Information Technology
23.68%
Financials
20.37%
Industrials
17.46%
Materials
10.68%
Consumer Staples
7.68%
Other
20.14%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QCH
AMPEREX TECH
4.57%
ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT
3.81%
MOUTAI
3.50%
CN PING AN
2.38%
ZIJIN MINING
2.18%
EOPTOLINK TECHNOLOGY INC
2.09%
MERCHANTS BANK
1.88%
MIDEA GROUP
1.54%
LUXSHARE
1.31%
YANGTZE POWER
1.29%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
QCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 285 total
24.55%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
QCH
ZEB
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CSI 300 Index - CNY | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.22% | 2.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2018 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about QCH and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QCH or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH has returned 7.92% year to date, while ZEB has returned 25.29%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QCH or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, QCH manages $31.99 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.58 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QCH and ZEB managed?
QCH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the CSI 300 Index - CNY benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QCH and ZEB emphasize?
QCH is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QCH or ZEB?
Year to date, QCH has seen +$1.73 M in net flows, compared with -$1,133.77 M for ZEB. QCH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QCH and ZEB compare?
QCH has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of QCH and ZEB?
QCH's largest holdings include AMPEREX TECH, ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT, and MOUTAI. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: QCH or ZEB?
QCH holds 273 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, QCH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QCH and ZEB
China’s Market Surge: ETFs Offering Exposure to the Rally
AI breakthroughs and new policy reforms are powering a sharp rally in Chinese equities.
Posted on 8/29/2025 by Kyle Anthony inChina
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.