VS
Compare CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) vs CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QQC and QQC.F provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QQC features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.2% for QQC.F. Performance-wise, QQC has returned 17.32% year-to-date with +$641 M in net flows, whereas QQC.F is at 13.05% with +$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQC
QQC.F
| AuM | $2,255.36 M | $1,521.56 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.41% | -0.50% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQC | -2.64% | -3.30% | +17.32% | +21.78% | +99.36% |
QQC.F | -3.55% | -3.84% | +13.05% | +17.23% | +83.59% | |
| Flows | QQC | +$53 M | +$261 M | +$641 M | +$816 M | +$1,567 M |
QQC.F | +$4 M | +$48 M | +$95 M | +$154 M | +$341 M |
QQC vs QQC.F exposure
Countries
QQC
USA
94.31%
QQC.F
USA
94.31%
Sectors
QQC
Technology
66.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
21.10%
QQC.F
Technology
66.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
21.10%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
QQC.F
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Diversification
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
QQC.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
Characteristics
Compare
QQC
QQC.F
| Provider | CI | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.33% | 0.34% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 26, 2021 | June 16, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about QQC and QQC.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQC or QQC.F?
As of September 16, 2026, QQC has returned 17.32% year to date, while QQC.F has returned 13.05%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQC or QQC.F?
As of September 16, 2026, QQC manages $2.26 B in assets, while QQC.F manages $1.52 B. QQC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQC and QQC.F managed?
QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. QQC.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QQC and QQC.F emphasize?
QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QQC.F is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQC or QQC.F?
Year to date, QQC has seen +$641.33 M in net flows, compared with +$94.95 M for QQC.F. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQC and QQC.F compare?
QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while QQC.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of QQC and QQC.F?
QQC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQC.F's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQC or QQC.F?
QQC holds 102 securities, while QQC.F holds 102. On holdings count, QQC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QQC and QQC.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.