VS
Compare CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) vs iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QQC and XQQU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QQC features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.35% for XQQU. Performance-wise, QQC has returned 20.04% year-to-date with +$640 M in net flows, whereas XQQU is at 20.11% with +$31 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQC
XQQU
| AuM | $2,306.82 M | $197.61 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.41% | -0.63% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQC | +1.15% | -3.26% | +20.04% | +23.23% | +104.00% |
XQQU | +1.44% | -3.25% | +20.11% | +23.21% | +111.21% | |
| Flows | QQC | +$48 M | +$252 M | +$640 M | +$803 M | +$1,566 M |
XQQU | +$2 M | +$7 M | +$31 M | +$15 M | +$137 M |
QQC vs XQQU exposure
Countries
QQC
USA
94.31%
XQQU
USA
94.34%
Sectors
QQC
Technology
66.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
21.10%
XQQU
Technology
67.72%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.02%
Other
20.26%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
XQQU
Apple, Inc.
8.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.87%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
3.07%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.66%
Diversification
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
XQQU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
46.04%
Characteristics
Compare
QQC
XQQU
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.32% | 0.22% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 26, 2021 | September 6, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about QQC and XQQU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQC or XQQU?
As of September 18, 2026, QQC has returned 20.04% year to date, while XQQU has returned 20.11%. XQQU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQC or XQQU?
As of September 18, 2026, QQC manages $2.31 B in assets, while XQQU manages $197.61 M. QQC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQC and XQQU managed?
QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XQQU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QQC and XQQU emphasize?
QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. XQQU is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQC or XQQU?
Year to date, QQC has seen +$640.33 M in net flows, compared with +$30.80 M for XQQU. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQC and XQQU compare?
QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XQQU has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of QQC and XQQU?
QQC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. XQQU's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQC or XQQU?
QQC holds 102 securities, while XQQU holds 102. On holdings count, QQC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QQC and XQQU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.