When evaluating costs, RCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, RCNS has returned 0.58% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 16.3% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RCNS
ZSP
| AuM | $36.72 M | $25,577.90 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.05% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCNS | +0.50% | -0.54% | +0.58% | +0.25% | - |
ZSP | -0.32% | +3.86% | +16.30% | +13.79% | +95.86% | |
| Flows | RCNS | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | - |
ZSP | +$226 M | +$751 M | +$1,163 M | +$1,897 M | +$5,672 M |
RCNS vs ZSP exposure
Countries
RCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.65%
Sectors
RCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.20%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
9.09%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.98%
Industrials
7.57%
Other
15.44%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.95%
Apple, Inc.
7.09%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
Tesla, Inc.
1.48%
Diversification
RCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.84%
Characteristics
Compare
RCNS
ZSP
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.61% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 20, 2024 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about RCNS and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RCNS or ZSP?
As of October 27, 2026, RCNS has returned 0.58% year to date, while ZSP has returned 16.30%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RCNS or ZSP?
As of October 27, 2026, RCNS manages $36.72 M in assets, while ZSP manages $25.58 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RCNS and ZSP managed?
RCNS is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RCNS or ZSP?
Year to date, RCNS has seen +$2.48 M in net flows, compared with +$1,162.93 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RCNS and ZSP compare?
RCNS has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about RCNS and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.