VS
Purpose Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (REM) and iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that REM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology, while XEQT leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, REM features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, REM has returned 25.17% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 13.84% with +$8 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
REM
XEQT
| AuM | $25.95 M | $22,259.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.31% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REM | +4.41% | +2.32% | +25.17% | +30.09% | +79.71% |
XEQT | -2.46% | +0.16% | +13.84% | +19.48% | +79.28% | |
| Flows | REM | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | +$10 M |
XEQT | +$1,060 M | +$3,083 M | +$8,172 M | +$9,925 M | +$16,013 M |
REM vs XEQT exposure
Countries
REM
China
25.33%
Brazil
17.83%
Other
13.91%
Taiwan
13.28%
Mexico
7.27%
Other
22.39%
XEQT
USA
44.48%
Canada
24.66%
Other
30.86%
Sectors
REM
Finance
38.23%
Other
13.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.30%
Technology
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.56%
Energy
7.87%
Other
11.01%
XEQT
Finance
25.23%
Technology
24.35%
Industrials
10.32%
Non-Energy Materials
7.46%
Energy
7.10%
Other
25.54%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
REM
CA74643B1031
12.78%
United Microelectronics Corp.
2.77%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.67%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.47%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.24%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
2.22%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.19%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.14%
Vale SA
2.11%
Standard Bank Group Ltd.
2.03%
XEQT
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.94%
Microsoft Corp.
2.08%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.43%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.22%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Shopify, Inc.
1.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.98%
Diversification
REM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 765 total
33.63%
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,298 total
17.37%
Characteristics
Compare
REM
XEQT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.93% | 1.60% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2017 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about REM and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: REM or XEQT?
As of September 16, 2026, REM has returned 25.17% year to date, while XEQT has returned 13.84%. REM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: REM or XEQT?
As of September 16, 2026, REM manages $25.95 M in assets, while XEQT manages $22.26 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are REM and XEQT managed?
REM is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
What sectors do REM and XEQT emphasize?
REM is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology. XEQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: REM or XEQT?
Year to date, REM has seen +$6.32 M in net flows, compared with +$8,171.52 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of REM and XEQT compare?
REM has an expense ratio of 1.31%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of REM and XEQT?
REM's largest holdings include Petróleo Brasileiro SA and United Microelectronics Corp.. XEQT's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: REM or XEQT?
REM holds 741 securities, while XEQT holds 8200. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about REM and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.