REM
Purpose Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

Full REM fund page
VS
ZWB
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF

Full ZWB fund page

Compare Purpose Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (REM) vs BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. REM provides Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology exposures, while ZWB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, REM features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, REM has returned 25.17% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 25.54% with +$35 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
REM
+4.41%+2.32%+25.17%+30.09%+79.71%
ZWB
-4.67%+2.04%+25.54%+41.85%+112.85%
Flows
REM
+$1 M+$1 M+$6 M+$10 M+$10 M
ZWB
-$18 M+$25 M+$35 M+$37 M-$245 M

REM vs ZWB exposure

Countries

REM
China
25.33%
Brazil
17.83%
Other
13.91%
Taiwan
13.28%
Mexico
7.27%
Other
22.39%
ZWB
Canada
100.03%

Sectors

REM
Finance
38.23%
Other
13.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.30%
Technology
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.56%
Energy
7.87%
Other
11.01%
ZWB
Finance
100.03%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

REM
CA74643B1031
12.78%
United Microelectronics Corp.
2.77%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.67%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.47%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.24%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
2.22%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.19%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.14%
Vale SA
2.11%
Standard Bank Group Ltd.
2.03%
ZWB
Bank of Montreal
17.17%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.06%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.82%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.57%
National Bank of Canada
16.29%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.13%

Diversification

REM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 765 total
33.63%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.03%

Characteristics

Compare
REM
ZWB
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.93%5.25%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 23, 2017January 28, 2011

Frequently asked questions about REM and ZWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: REM or ZWB?
As of September 16, 2026, REM has returned 25.17% year to date, while ZWB has returned 25.54%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: REM or ZWB?
As of September 16, 2026, REM manages $25.95 M in assets, while ZWB manages $4.62 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are REM and ZWB managed?
REM is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do REM and ZWB emphasize?
REM is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology. ZWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: REM or ZWB?
Year to date, REM has seen +$6.32 M in net flows, compared with +$35.05 M for ZWB. ZWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of REM and ZWB compare?
REM has an expense ratio of 1.31%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of REM and ZWB?
REM's largest holdings include Petróleo Brasileiro SA and United Microelectronics Corp.. ZWB's top holdings include Bank of Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: REM or ZWB?
REM holds 741 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, REM is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about REM and ZWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds