RENG
RBC Global Energy Fund

Full RENG fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, RENG features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, RENG has returned 41.88% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.08% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.0%Oct 12Oct 19Oct 26Nov 2Nov 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RENG
-4.30%+4.99%+41.88%+37.97%+66.56%
XIC
+0.61%-0.29%+16.08%+21.90%+99.03%
Flows
RENG
+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M+$2 M+$2 M
XIC
+$367 M+$4,374 M+$11,424 M+$12,567 M+$17,274 M

RENG vs XIC exposure

Countries

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.55%

Sectors

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.17%
Non-Energy Materials
18.24%
Energy
16.19%
Industrials
8.03%
Other
16.38%
As of November 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.73%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.48%
Shopify, Inc.
5.07%
Bank of Montreal
3.32%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.14%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.92%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.85%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.75%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.63%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.25%

Diversification

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 216 total
38.13%

Characteristics

Compare
RENG
XIC
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.80%1.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 8, 2023February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about RENG and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RENG or XIC?
As of November 10, 2026, RENG has returned 41.88% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.08%. RENG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RENG or XIC?
As of November 10, 2026, RENG manages $3.68 M in assets, while XIC manages $37.06 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RENG and XIC managed?
RENG is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RENG or XIC?
Year to date, RENG has seen +$1.83 M in net flows, compared with +$11,423.60 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RENG and XIC compare?
RENG has an expense ratio of 1.02%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about RENG and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds