RENG
RBC Global Energy Fund

Full RENG fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, RENG features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, RENG has returned 43.72% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 14.63% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RENG
+1.78%+16.70%+43.72%+44.59%+60.67%
XIC
-1.33%+2.95%+14.63%+24.30%+89.35%
Flows
RENG
+$0 M-$3 M+$2 M+$2 M+$2 M
XIC
+$1,388 M+$2,850 M+$8,685 M+$9,109 M+$14,851 M

RENG vs XIC exposure

Countries

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.46%

Sectors

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.19%
As of September 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%

Diversification

RENG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%

Characteristics

Compare
RENG
XIC
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.78%1.96%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 8, 2023February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about RENG and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RENG or XIC?
As of September 18, 2026, RENG has returned 43.72% year to date, while XIC has returned 14.63%. RENG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RENG or XIC?
As of September 18, 2026, RENG manages $3.73 M in assets, while XIC manages $34.03 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RENG and XIC managed?
RENG is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RENG or XIC?
Year to date, RENG has seen +$1.83 M in net flows, compared with +$8,684.54 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RENG and XIC compare?
RENG has an expense ratio of 1.02%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about RENG and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds