RGBM
Return Stacked Global Balanced & Macro ETF

Full RGBM fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, RGBM features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, RGBM has returned 16.78% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 35.79% with +$267 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RGBM
+0.49%+3.54%+16.78%+29.27%-
ZEB
+6.04%+19.90%+35.79%+71.33%+157.89%
Flows
RGBM
+$0 M+$1 M-$1 M-$1 M-
ZEB
+$1,233 M+$1,278 M+$267 M+$768 M-$484 M

RGBM vs ZEB exposure

Countries

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
RGBM
ZEB
ProviderReturn Stacked ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyCapitalizationDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.23%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 3, 2025October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about RGBM and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGBM or ZEB?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM has returned 16.78% year to date, while ZEB has returned 35.79%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGBM or ZEB?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM manages $32.52 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.49 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGBM and ZEB managed?
RGBM is actively managed by Return Stacked ETFs. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGBM or ZEB?
Year to date, RGBM has seen -$0.75 M in net flows, compared with +$266.52 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGBM and ZEB compare?
RGBM has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Recent articles about RGBM and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds