VS
When evaluating costs, RGCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RGCB
ZEB
| AuM | $0.98 M | $8,886.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.53% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGCB | +0.87% | -1.11% | - | - | - |
ZEB | +5.35% | +1.63% | +35.06% | +45.99% | +177.40% | |
| Flows | RGCB | +$0 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
ZEB | +$1,672 M | +$1,514 M | +$1,768 M | +$2,157 M | +$969 M |
RGCB vs ZEB exposure
Countries
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.14%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.99%
Bank of Montreal
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.49%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.45%
National Bank of Canada
16.14%
Diversification
RGCB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
RGCB
ZEB
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.28% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 12, 2026 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about RGCB and ZEB
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGCB or ZEB?
As of November 11, 2026, RGCB manages $0.98 M in assets, while ZEB manages $8.89 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGCB and ZEB managed?
RGCB is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RGCB and ZEB compare?
RGCB has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about RGCB and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.