VS
When evaluating costs, RLST features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, RLST has returned 11.66% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 33.15% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RLST
ZEB
| AuM | $28.99 M | $8,016.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.94% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.53% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RLST | -10.29% | -5.43% | +11.66% | +8.06% | - |
ZEB | +3.70% | +0.28% | +33.15% | +44.88% | +176.07% | |
| Flows | RLST | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$3 M | - |
ZEB | +$314 M | +$969 M | +$1,017 M | +$1,429 M | -$101 M |
RLST vs ZEB exposure
Countries
RLST
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
RLST
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RLST
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.14%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.99%
Bank of Montreal
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.49%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.45%
National Bank of Canada
16.14%
Diversification
RLST
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
RLST
ZEB
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 18, 2024 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about RLST and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RLST or ZEB?
As of November 2, 2026, RLST has returned 11.66% year to date, while ZEB has returned 33.15%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RLST or ZEB?
As of November 2, 2026, RLST manages $28.99 M in assets, while ZEB manages $8.02 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RLST and ZEB managed?
RLST is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RLST or ZEB?
Year to date, RLST has seen +$7.58 M in net flows, compared with +$1,017.45 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RLST and ZEB compare?
RLST has an expense ratio of 0.94%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about RLST and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.