VS
When evaluating costs, SBUL features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, SBUL has returned 21.02% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 35.86% with -$461 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SBUL
HBNK
| AuM | $0.88 M | $807.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.44% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SBUL | -20.41% | -27.54% | -21.02% | +48.47% | - |
HBNK | +6.04% | +19.91% | +35.86% | +71.53% | +159.08% | |
| Flows | SBUL | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$1 M | +$0 M | - |
HBNK | -$44 M | +$39 M | -$461 M | -$767 M | +$3 M |
SBUL vs HBNK exposure
Countries
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
SBUL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SBUL
HBNK
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.48% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 16, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about SBUL and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SBUL or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, SBUL has returned -21.02% year to date, while HBNK has returned 35.86%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SBUL or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, SBUL manages $0.88 M in assets, while HBNK manages $807.27 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SBUL and HBNK managed?
SBUL is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SBUL or HBNK?
Year to date, SBUL has seen -$0.90 M in net flows, compared with -$461.23 M for HBNK. SBUL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SBUL and HBNK compare?
SBUL has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about SBUL and HBNK
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.