VS
When evaluating costs, SRIU features a management fee (MER) of 0.14%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, SRIU has returned 14.14% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas QUU is at 16.47% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SRIU
QUU
| AuM | $250.62 M | $7,371.32 M |
| Management Fees | 0.14% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SRIU | -0.43% | +1.29% | +14.14% | +10.71% | +94.46% |
QUU | -0.40% | +3.94% | +16.47% | +13.68% | +98.26% | |
| Flows | SRIU | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$14 M | +$126 M |
QUU | +$247 M | +$920 M | +$1,570 M | +$1,872 M | +$2,576 M |
SRIU vs QUU exposure
Countries
SRIU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
USA
97.64%
Sectors
SRIU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Technology
45.27%
Finance
13.23%
Healthcare
9.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.71%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
15.80%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SRIU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.73%
Apple, Inc.
6.83%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
SRIU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.31%
Characteristics
Compare
SRIU
QUU
| Provider | Scotia Bank | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Responsible US Equity Index NTR - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.59% | 0.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | January 13, 2022 | January 24, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about SRIU and QUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SRIU or QUU?
As of October 27, 2026, SRIU has returned 14.14% year to date, while QUU has returned 16.47%. QUU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SRIU or QUU?
As of October 27, 2026, SRIU manages $250.62 M in assets, while QUU manages $7.37 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SRIU and QUU managed?
SRIU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive Responsible US Equity Index NTR - CAD benchmark. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SRIU or QUU?
Year to date, SRIU has seen +$10.52 M in net flows, compared with +$1,570.03 M for QUU. QUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SRIU and QUU compare?
SRIU has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about SRIU and QUU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.