VS
When evaluating costs, TLF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, TLF has returned 13.07% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 11.55% with +$10 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TLF
XEQT
| AuM | $145.53 M | $23,268.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.96% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TLF | -16.51% | -10.75% | +13.07% | +12.95% | +78.00% |
XEQT | -4.77% | -4.28% | +11.55% | +12.34% | +78.36% | |
| Flows | TLF | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$8 M | +$6 M | +$11 M |
XEQT | +$1,094 M | +$2,960 M | +$9,731 M | +$10,610 M | +$17,469 M |
TLF vs XEQT exposure
Countries
TLF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
TLF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TLF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
TLF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
TLF
XEQT
| Provider | Brompton Group | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.90% | 1.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2011 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about TLF and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TLF or XEQT?
As of November 4, 2026, TLF has returned 13.07% year to date, while XEQT has returned 11.55%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TLF or XEQT?
As of November 4, 2026, TLF manages $145.53 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.27 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TLF and XEQT managed?
TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TLF or XEQT?
Year to date, TLF has seen +$7.66 M in net flows, compared with +$9,731.23 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TLF and XEQT compare?
TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about TLF and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.