VS
When evaluating costs, UMAX features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.81% for ENCC. Performance-wise, UMAX has returned 4.74% year-to-date with +$486 M in net flows, whereas ENCC is at 37.27% with -$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
UMAX
ENCC
| AuM | $1,436.70 M | $816.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.81% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.76% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMAX | +3.30% | -6.29% | +4.74% | +5.07% | +31.65% |
ENCC | +6.87% | +5.94% | +37.27% | +41.64% | +58.65% | |
| Flows | UMAX | -$15 M | +$122 M | +$486 M | +$601 M | +$1,456 M |
ENCC | -$7 M | +$23 M | -$21 M | +$34 M | +$479 M |
UMAX vs ENCC exposure
Countries
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ENCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ENCC
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ENCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ENCC
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
UMAX
ENCC
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 14.68% | 10.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 14, 2023 | April 11, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about UMAX and ENCC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: UMAX or ENCC?
As of October 28, 2026, UMAX has returned 4.74% year to date, while ENCC has returned 37.27%. ENCC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: UMAX or ENCC?
As of October 28, 2026, UMAX manages $1.44 B in assets, while ENCC manages $816.66 M. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are UMAX and ENCC managed?
UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ENCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: UMAX or ENCC?
Year to date, UMAX has seen +$486.44 M in net flows, compared with -$21.06 M for ENCC. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of UMAX and ENCC compare?
UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while ENCC has an expense ratio of 0.76%.
Recent articles about UMAX and ENCC
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.