VS
When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.2% for CIAI. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 13.72% year-to-date with +$4 B in net flows, whereas CIAI is at 23.57% with -$41 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VFV
CIAI
| AuM | $35,249.09 M | $1,185.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.64% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.10% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFV | -1.26% | +3.14% | +13.72% | +17.60% | +80.69% |
CIAI | -2.05% | +0.63% | +23.57% | +25.18% | - | |
| Flows | VFV | +$525 M | +$1,525 M | +$3,784 M | +$4,887 M | +$14,861 M |
CIAI | -$8 M | +$62 M | -$41 M | +$10 M | - |
VFV vs CIAI exposure
Countries
VFV
USA
97.41%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
VFV
Technology
44.70%
Finance
13.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.41%
Healthcare
8.88%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
15.33%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.55%
Apple, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
5.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.46%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.60%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
VFV
CIAI
| Provider | Vanguard | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2012 | May 2, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about VFV and CIAI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or CIAI?
As of September 11, 2026, VFV has returned 13.72% year to date, while CIAI has returned 23.57%. CIAI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or CIAI?
As of September 11, 2026, VFV manages $35.25 B in assets, while CIAI manages $1.19 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and CIAI managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or CIAI?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$3,784.44 M in net flows, compared with -$40.78 M for CIAI. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and CIAI compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%.
Recent articles about VFV and CIAI
Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted on 7/20/2026 by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.