VS
Compare Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) vs Desjardins RI USA - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VFV and DRMU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.2% for DRMU. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 13.63% year-to-date with +$4 B in net flows, whereas DRMU is at 13.08% with -$189 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VFV
DRMU
| AuM | $35,078.41 M | $95.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.10% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFV | -2.40% | +1.00% | +13.63% | +21.08% | +79.38% |
DRMU | -2.25% | +1.01% | +13.08% | +20.82% | +75.46% | |
| Flows | VFV | +$392 M | +$1,682 M | +$3,640 M | +$4,819 M | +$14,756 M |
DRMU | -$237 M | -$237 M | -$189 M | -$191 M | -$150 M |
VFV vs DRMU exposure
Countries
VFV
USA
96.38%
DRMU
USA
96.33%
Sectors
VFV
Technology
44.70%
Finance
13.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.41%
Healthcare
8.88%
Industrials
7.61%
Other
15.57%
DRMU
Technology
44.56%
Finance
13.92%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.15%
Healthcare
9.14%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
15.41%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.55%
Apple, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
5.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.46%
DRMU
Apple, Inc.
7.68%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.05%
Microsoft Corp.
4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Broadcom Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.84%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.49%
Diversification
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.60%
DRMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
36.29%
Characteristics
Compare
VFV
DRMU
| Provider | Vanguard | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.84% | 1.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2012 | September 27, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about VFV and DRMU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or DRMU?
As of September 2, 2026, VFV has returned 13.63% year to date, while DRMU has returned 13.08%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or DRMU?
As of September 2, 2026, VFV manages $35.08 B in assets, while DRMU manages $95.31 M. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and DRMU managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. DRMU is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VFV and DRMU emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. DRMU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or DRMU?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$3,639.76 M in net flows, compared with -$188.77 M for DRMU. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and DRMU compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while DRMU has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of VFV and DRMU?
VFV's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. DRMU's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or DRMU?
VFV holds 495 securities, while DRMU holds 497. On holdings count, DRMU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VFV and DRMU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.