Compare Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) vs Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VSP) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VFV and VSP provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for VSP. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 11.47% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas VSP is at 7.84% with +$472 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VFV
VSP
| AuM | $34,019.94 M | $6,107.37 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.18% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFV | -1.98% | +6.66% | +11.47% | +19.44% | +78.66% |
VSP | -0.86% | +3.10% | +7.84% | +15.65% | +60.80% | |
| Flows | VFV | +$625 M | +$1,846 M | +$3,240 M | +$4,733 M | +$14,553 M |
VSP | +$53 M | +$241 M | +$472 M | +$620 M | +$1,770 M |
VFV vs VSP exposure
Countries
VFV
USA
96.91%
VSP
USA
96.91%
Sectors
VFV
Technology
45.60%
Finance
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Healthcare
8.64%
Industrials
7.92%
Other
16.18%
VSP
Technology
45.60%
Finance
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Healthcare
8.64%
Industrials
7.92%
Other
16.18%
As of July 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.56%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
VSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.56%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
Diversification
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.23%
VSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.23%
Characteristics
Compare
VFV
VSP
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.85% | 0.87% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2012 | November 2, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about VFV and VSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or VSP?
As of July 30, 2026, VFV has returned 11.47% year to date, while VSP has returned 7.84%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or VSP?
As of July 30, 2026, VFV manages $34.02 B in assets, while VSP manages $6.11 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and VSP managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. VSP is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VFV and VSP emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. VSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or VSP?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$3,240.11 M in net flows, compared with +$471.58 M for VSP. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and VSP compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of VFV and VSP?
VFV's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. VSP's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or VSP?
VFV holds 496 securities, while VSP holds 496. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VFV and VSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.