VFV
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

Full VFV fund page
VS
XUS
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF

Full XUS fund page

Compare Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) vs iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VFV provides Information Technology, Communication Services, and Financials exposures, while XUS is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for XUS. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 0.15% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas XUS is at 0.32% with +$935 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 7

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VFV
+1.74%-1.92%+0.15%+33.39%+75.72%
XUS
+1.84%-1.87%+0.32%+34.01%+74.31%
Flows
VFV
+$477 M+$1,230 M+$1,282 M+$4,014 M+$13,444 M
XUS
+$525 M+$917 M+$935 M+$1,150 M+$3,043 M

VFV vs XUS exposure

Countries

VFV
USA
96.48%
XUS
USA
96.80%

Sectors

VFV
Information Technology
33.40%
Communication Services
10.45%
Financials
10.10%
Consumer Discretionary
10.08%
Health Care
9.66%
Industrials
8.52%
Other
17.79%
XUS
Information Technology
33.98%
Financials
10.48%
Communication Services
10.27%
Consumer Discretionary
10.04%
Health Care
9.46%
Industrials
8.46%
Other
17.31%
As of April 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VFV
NVIDIA
7.30%
APPLE
6.62%
MICROSOFT-T
4.95%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.47%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.08%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.56%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.46%
META PLATFORMS
2.39%
TESLA
1.92%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.57%
XUS
NVIDIA
7.59%
APPLE
6.82%
MICROSOFT-T
5.05%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.42%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.02%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.57%
META PLATFORMS
2.42%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.41%
TESLA
1.94%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.56%

Diversification

VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.32%
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
36.79%

Characteristics

Compare
VFV
XUS
ProviderVanguardiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CADS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.93%1.26%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 2, 2012April 10, 2013

Frequently asked questions about VFV and XUS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or XUS?
As of April 8, 2026, VFV has returned 0.15% year to date, while XUS has returned 0.32%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or XUS?
As of April 8, 2026, VFV manages $28.86 B in assets, while XUS manages $11.29 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and XUS managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VFV and XUS emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Financials. XUS is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or XUS?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$1,282.15 M in net flows, compared with +$935.07 M for XUS. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and XUS compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of VFV and XUS?
VFV's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. XUS's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or XUS?
VFV holds 479 securities, while XUS holds 479. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VFV and XUS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds