VS
Compare Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) vs iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VFV and XUS.U provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for XUS.U. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 11.71% year-to-date with +$5 B in net flows, whereas XUS.U is at 8.55% with +$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VFV
XUS.U
| AuM | $35,695.80 M | $537.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.14% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFV | -6.19% | -3.36% | +11.71% | +10.78% | +80.64% |
XUS.U | -5.61% | -4.11% | +8.55% | +10.71% | +74.16% | |
| Flows | VFV | +$1,059 M | +$1,759 M | +$4,964 M | +$5,505 M | +$15,725 M |
XUS.U | -$2 M | +$13 M | +$60 M | +$67 M | +$213 M |
VFV vs XUS.U exposure
Countries
VFV
USA
97.38%
XUS.U
USA
97.46%
Sectors
VFV
Technology
47.61%
Finance
12.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.59%
Industrials
7.28%
Other
14.83%
XUS.U
Technology
47.58%
Finance
12.66%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.59%
Industrials
7.28%
Other
14.82%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
8.37%
Apple, Inc.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
5.77%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
XUS.U
US4642872000
99.94%
Diversification
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
39.00%
XUS.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
VFV
XUS.U
| Provider | Vanguard | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.88% | 1.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2012 | October 9, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about VFV and XUS.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or XUS.U?
As of November 6, 2026, VFV has returned 11.71% year to date, while XUS.U has returned 8.55%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or XUS.U?
As of November 6, 2026, VFV manages $35.70 B in assets, while XUS.U manages $537.38 M. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and XUS.U managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. XUS.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or XUS.U?
VFV holds 500 securities, while XUS.U holds 1. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or XUS.U?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$4,964.15 M in net flows, compared with +$60.00 M for XUS.U. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and XUS.U compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XUS.U has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What sectors do VFV and XUS.U emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XUS.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about VFV and XUS.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.