VS
Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FLUS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VUN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while FLUS leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, VUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.25% for FLUS. Performance-wise, VUN has returned 14.62% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas FLUS is at 15.68% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VUN
FLUS
| AuM | $19,914.37 M | $133.24 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.29% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.13% | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VUN | -0.30% | +0.64% | +14.62% | +17.34% | +82.36% |
FLUS | +0.03% | -0.35% | +15.68% | +17.82% | +87.10% | |
| Flows | VUN | +$392 M | +$1,052 M | +$3,232 M | +$3,943 M | +$7,072 M |
FLUS | +$0 M | -$7 M | +$5 M | +$22 M | +$40 M |
VUN vs FLUS exposure
Countries
VUN
USA
97.06%
FLUS
USA
99.66%
Sectors
VUN
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
FLUS
Technology
45.74%
Finance
12.59%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.20%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
14.57%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VUN
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
FLUS
Apple, Inc.
8.22%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.53%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.57%
Johnson & Johnson
2.00%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.97%
Diversification
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
FLUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 215 total
37.09%
Characteristics
Compare
VUN
FLUS
| Provider | Vanguard | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.76% | 0.61% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | May 6, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about VUN and FLUS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUN or FLUS?
As of September 18, 2026, VUN has returned 14.62% year to date, while FLUS has returned 15.68%. FLUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUN or FLUS?
As of September 18, 2026, VUN manages $19.91 B in assets, while FLUS manages $133.24 M. VUN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUN and FLUS managed?
VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FLUS is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VUN and FLUS emphasize?
VUN is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. FLUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUN or FLUS?
Year to date, VUN has seen +$3,232.03 M in net flows, compared with +$5.18 M for FLUS. VUN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUN and FLUS compare?
VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while FLUS has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of VUN and FLUS?
VUN's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. FLUS's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VUN or FLUS?
VUN holds 3324 securities, while FLUS holds 214. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VUN and FLUS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.