VUN
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF

Full VUN fund page
VS
VFV
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

Full VFV fund page

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VUN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services, while VFV leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, VUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.08% for VFV. Performance-wise, VUN has returned 8.73% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas VFV is at 8.34% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VUN
+0.37%+10.50%+8.73%+24.05%+79.34%
VFV
+0.08%+10.28%+8.34%+23.90%+81.37%
Flows
VUN
+$387 M+$1,043 M+$2,106 M+$3,270 M+$6,040 M
VFV
+$720 M+$1,410 M+$2,260 M+$4,065 M+$14,259 M

VUN vs VFV exposure

Countries

VUN
USA
95.85%
VFV
USA
96.62%

Sectors

VUN
Information Technology
33.00%
Financials
10.03%
Communication Services
9.94%
Consumer Discretionary
9.87%
Industrials
9.10%
Health Care
8.78%
Other
19.27%
VFV
Information Technology
35.60%
Communication Services
10.96%
Consumer Discretionary
10.09%
Financials
9.73%
Health Care
8.36%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
17.20%
As of June 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VUN
NVIDIA
6.62%
APPLE
5.72%
MICROSOFT-T
4.35%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.68%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.22%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.84%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.54%
META PLATFORMS
1.92%
TESLA
1.54%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.22%
VFV
NVIDIA
7.83%
APPLE
6.44%
MICROSOFT-T
4.89%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.62%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.89%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.73%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.40%

Diversification

VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,409 total
33.66%
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
38.34%

Characteristics

Compare
VUN
VFV
ProviderVanguardVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CADS&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.77%0.86%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 2, 2013November 2, 2012

Frequently asked questions about VUN and VFV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUN or VFV?
As of June 10, 2026, VUN has returned 8.73% year to date, while VFV has returned 8.34%. VUN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUN or VFV?
As of June 10, 2026, VUN manages $17.85 B in assets, while VFV manages $32.19 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUN and VFV managed?
VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VUN and VFV emphasize?
VUN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. VFV is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUN or VFV?
Year to date, VUN has seen +$2,105.69 M in net flows, compared with +$2,259.63 M for VFV. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUN and VFV compare?
VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of VUN and VFV?
VUN's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. VFV's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: VUN or VFV?
VUN holds 2731 securities, while VFV holds 478. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VUN and VFV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds