VS
Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VUN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while VFV leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, VUN features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.08% for VFV. Performance-wise, VUN has returned 13.18% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas VFV is at 12.99% with +$4 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VUN
VFV
| AuM | $19,572.64 M | $34,961.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.13% | 0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VUN | -2.51% | +2.46% | +13.18% | +17.60% | +77.47% |
VFV | -2.30% | +2.63% | +12.99% | +17.92% | +79.54% | |
| Flows | VUN | +$408 M | +$1,081 M | +$3,140 M | +$3,915 M | +$6,987 M |
VFV | +$492 M | +$1,543 M | +$3,723 M | +$4,831 M | +$14,799 M |
VUN vs VFV exposure
Countries
VUN
USA
97.06%
VFV
USA
97.41%
Sectors
VUN
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
VFV
Technology
44.70%
Finance
13.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.41%
Healthcare
8.88%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
15.33%
As of September 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VUN
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.55%
Apple, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
5.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.46%
Diversification
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.60%
Characteristics
Compare
VUN
VFV
| Provider | Vanguard | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.77% | 0.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 2, 2013 | November 2, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about VUN and VFV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VUN or VFV?
As of September 9, 2026, VUN has returned 13.18% year to date, while VFV has returned 12.99%. VUN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VUN or VFV?
As of September 9, 2026, VUN manages $19.57 B in assets, while VFV manages $34.96 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VUN and VFV managed?
VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VUN and VFV emphasize?
VUN is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VUN or VFV?
Year to date, VUN has seen +$3,140.09 M in net flows, compared with +$3,722.64 M for VFV. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VUN and VFV compare?
VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of VUN and VFV?
VUN's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. VFV's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VUN or VFV?
VUN holds 3324 securities, while VFV holds 500. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VUN and VFV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.