iShares China Index ETF (XCH) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, XCH features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XCH has returned 11.08% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 33.15% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCH
ZEB
| AuM | $170.53 M | $8,016.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.86% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.53% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCH | -1.83% | -9.13% | -11.08% | -15.95% | +39.02% |
ZEB | +3.70% | +0.28% | +33.15% | +44.88% | +176.07% | |
| Flows | XCH | +$0 M | -$7 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | +$77 M |
ZEB | +$314 M | +$969 M | +$1,017 M | +$1,429 M | -$101 M |
XCH vs ZEB exposure
Countries
XCH
China
94.38%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
XCH
Finance
37.91%
Technology
21.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.42%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.76%
Other
21.39%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCH
US4642871846
99.95%
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.14%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.99%
Bank of Montreal
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.49%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.45%
National Bank of Canada
16.14%
Diversification
XCH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
99.95%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
XCH
ZEB
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.87% | 2.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 21, 2010 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about XCH and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCH or ZEB?
As of November 2, 2026, XCH has returned -11.08% year to date, while ZEB has returned 33.15%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCH or ZEB?
As of November 2, 2026, XCH manages $170.53 M in assets, while ZEB manages $8.02 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCH and ZEB managed?
XCH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE China 50 Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCH or ZEB?
XCH holds 1 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCH or ZEB?
Year to date, XCH has seen -$1.56 M in net flows, compared with +$1,017.45 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCH and ZEB compare?
XCH has an expense ratio of 0.86%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What sectors do XCH and ZEB emphasize?
XCH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Recent articles about XCH and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.