VS
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CA) (CIBR) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCHP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while CIBR leans towards Technology, Industrials, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for CIBR. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 69.08% year-to-date with +$263 M in net flows, whereas CIBR is at 49.88% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
CIBR
| AuM | $347.68 M | $189.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | -0.29% | -6.21% | +69.08% | +72.19% | +220.73% |
CIBR | +4.47% | +12.31% | +49.88% | +38.25% | +131.45% | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$39 M | +$67 M | +$263 M | +$257 M | +$303 M |
CIBR | +$10 M | +$8 M | +$25 M | +$24 M | +$71 M |
XCHP vs CIBR exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
83.35%
Other
16.65%
CIBR
USA
89.25%
Other
10.75%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.82%
CIBR
Technology
93.44%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
NVIDIA Corp.
9.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.89%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.22%
Broadcom Inc.
7.47%
Intel Corp.
5.09%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
4.65%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.65%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.59%
Lam Research Corp.
4.27%
KLA Corp.
4.11%
CIBR
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
9.53%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
8.72%
Fortinet, Inc.
8.69%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
6.75%
Broadcom Inc.
6.13%
Cloudflare, Inc.
4.38%
Okta, Inc.
4.00%
Zscaler, Inc.
3.59%
F5, Inc.
3.02%
Rubrik, Inc.
2.74%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.36%
CIBR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
57.55%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
CIBR
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | Nasdaq Consumer Technology Association Cybersecurity Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.17% | 0.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | October 30, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and CIBR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or CIBR?
As of October 15, 2026, XCHP has returned 69.08% year to date, while CIBR has returned 49.88%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or CIBR?
As of October 15, 2026, XCHP manages $347.68 M in assets, while CIBR manages $189.67 M. XCHP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and CIBR managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. CIBR is passively managed by First Trust. It tracks the Nasdaq Consumer Technology Association Cybersecurity Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and CIBR emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. CIBR is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or CIBR?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$262.96 M in net flows, compared with +$24.60 M for CIBR. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and CIBR compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while CIBR has an expense ratio of 0.75%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and CIBR?
XCHP's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Micron Technology, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. CIBR's top holdings include Palo Alto Networks, Inc., CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., and Fortinet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or CIBR?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while CIBR holds 41. On holdings count, CIBR is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and CIBR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.