VS
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CA) (CIBR) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XCHP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while CIBR leans towards Technology, Industrials, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, XCHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for CIBR. Performance-wise, XCHP has returned 76.99% year-to-date with +$198 M in net flows, whereas CIBR is at 31.79% with +$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCHP
CIBR
| AuM | $304.36 M | $158.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCHP | -13.08% | +28.56% | +76.99% | +115.94% | - |
CIBR | +8.45% | +42.91% | +31.79% | +28.76% | +112.48% | |
| Flows | XCHP | +$55 M | +$159 M | +$198 M | +$190 M | - |
CIBR | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$15 M | +$24 M | +$61 M |
XCHP vs CIBR exposure
Countries
XCHP
USA
85.27%
Other
14.73%
CIBR
USA
90.94%
Other
9.06%
Sectors
XCHP
Technology
99.86%
CIBR
Technology
95.44%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
11.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
9.48%
Broadcom Inc.
6.90%
Intel Corp.
6.20%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
6.19%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.88%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.45%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
4.35%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.55%
NXP Semiconductors NV
3.49%
CIBR
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
11.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
10.60%
Fortinet, Inc.
8.91%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
8.02%
Broadcom Inc.
7.56%
Cloudflare, Inc.
4.13%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
3.30%
Datadog, Inc.
3.26%
Okta, Inc.
3.20%
F5, Inc.
2.82%
Diversification
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
62.12%
CIBR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
62.85%
Characteristics
Compare
XCHP
CIBR
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD | Nasdaq Consumer Technology Association Cybersecurity Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | October 30, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about XCHP and CIBR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCHP or CIBR?
As of July 16, 2026, XCHP has returned 76.99% year to date, while CIBR has returned 31.79%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCHP or CIBR?
As of July 16, 2026, XCHP manages $304.36 M in assets, while CIBR manages $158.57 M. XCHP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCHP and CIBR managed?
XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. CIBR is passively managed by First Trust. It tracks the Nasdaq Consumer Technology Association Cybersecurity Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XCHP and CIBR emphasize?
XCHP is most exposed to Technology. CIBR is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCHP or CIBR?
Year to date, XCHP has seen +$198.39 M in net flows, compared with +$14.64 M for CIBR. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCHP and CIBR compare?
XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while CIBR has an expense ratio of 0.75%.
What are the top holdings of XCHP and CIBR?
XCHP's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. CIBR's top holdings include CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc., and Fortinet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XCHP or CIBR?
XCHP holds 30 securities, while CIBR holds 41. On holdings count, CIBR is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCHP and CIBR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.