XCLN
iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF

Full XCLN fund page
VS
HURA
Global X Uranium Index ETF

Full HURA fund page

Compare iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) vs Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCLN provides Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while HURA is primarily weighted in Energy, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.99% for HURA. Performance-wise, XCLN has returned 26.02% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas HURA is at 21.38% with +$31 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28May 5

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 7, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XCLN
+14.51%+9.81%+26.02%+76.04%+18.53%
HURA
+10.91%-3.57%+21.38%+101.49%+186.84%
Flows
XCLN
+$3 M+$5 M+$6 M+$9 M+$16 M
HURA
+$5 M+$6 M+$31 M+$51 M+$68 M

XCLN vs HURA exposure

Countries

XCLN
USA
42.28%
China
17.62%
Brazil
8.49%
Spain
8.21%
Other
23.41%
HURA
Canada
49.03%
USA
34.14%
Other
16.83%

Sectors

XCLN
Utilities
43.49%
Industrials
25.60%
Information Technology
14.44%
Other
13.29%
HURA
Energy
48.04%
Other
29.11%
Financials
15.35%
Industrials
7.14%
As of May 7, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XCLN
US65290E1010
10.18%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
9.41%
FIRST SOLAR
6.14%
IBERDROLA SA
5.77%
YANGTZE POWER
4.71%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
3.20%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.04%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.91%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
2.69%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.24%
HURA
CAMECO
21.63%
US63253R2013
16.59%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
15.35%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.35%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.23%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.35%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.63%
CGN MINING
3.07%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.81%
DENISON MINES
2.61%

Diversification

XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 99 total
50.29%
HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.62%

Characteristics

Compare
XCLN
HURA
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CADSolactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.18%0.07%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateApril 26, 2022May 16, 2019

Frequently asked questions about XCLN and HURA

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCLN or HURA?
As of May 7, 2026, XCLN has returned 26.02% year to date, while HURA has returned 21.38%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or HURA?
As of May 7, 2026, XCLN manages $25.90 M in assets, while HURA manages $211.72 M. HURA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and HURA managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCLN and HURA emphasize?
XCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology. HURA is most exposed to Energy, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCLN or HURA?
Year to date, XCLN has seen +$6.45 M in net flows, compared with +$31.05 M for HURA. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCLN and HURA compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of XCLN and HURA?
XCLN's largest holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP and FIRST SOLAR. HURA's top holdings include CAMECO and SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLN or HURA?
XCLN holds 90 securities, while HURA holds 28. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XCLN and HURA

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds