VS
Compare iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) vs Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCLN provides Industrials, Utilities, and Technology exposures, while HURA is primarily weighted in Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.99% for HURA. Performance-wise, XCLN has returned 14.86% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas HURA is at 9.97% with +$49 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCLN
HURA
| AuM | $27.81 M | $172.03 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.58% | -0.93% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLN | -10.86% | -2.36% | +14.86% | +41.21% | +6.48% |
HURA | -15.70% | -27.00% | -9.97% | +0.98% | +99.96% | |
| Flows | XCLN | +$2 M | +$6 M | +$11 M | +$14 M | +$20 M |
HURA | +$5 M | +$21 M | +$49 M | +$73 M | +$87 M |
XCLN vs HURA exposure
Countries
XCLN
USA
46.48%
China
18.16%
Other
35.36%
HURA
Canada
47.78%
USA
21.17%
Kazakhstan
15.12%
Other
15.93%
Sectors
XCLN
Industrials
56.96%
Utilities
32.15%
Technology
9.26%
HURA
Energy
57.92%
Non-Corporate
14.78%
Industrials
11.00%
Utilities
8.43%
Other
7.87%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
12.16%
First Solar, Inc.
9.57%
Nextpower, Inc.
8.42%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
5.92%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.32%
Plug Power, Inc.
3.65%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.02%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
2.71%
Equatorial SA
2.27%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.13%
HURA
Cameco Corp.
21.98%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
15.12%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.78%
Oklo, Inc.
8.43%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.09%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.37%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.42%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.95%
NuScale Power Corp.
2.89%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.57%
Diversification
XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 104 total
55.17%
HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.60%
Characteristics
Compare
XCLN
HURA
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD | Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.90% | 0.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | May 16, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XCLN and HURA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCLN or HURA?
As of July 17, 2026, XCLN has returned 14.86% year to date, while HURA has returned -9.97%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or HURA?
As of July 17, 2026, XCLN manages $27.81 M in assets, while HURA manages $172.03 M. HURA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and HURA managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCLN and HURA emphasize?
XCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. HURA is most exposed to Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCLN or HURA?
Year to date, XCLN has seen +$11.30 M in net flows, compared with +$48.70 M for HURA. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCLN and HURA compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of XCLN and HURA?
XCLN's largest holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc., and Nextpower, Inc.. HURA's top holdings include Cameco Corp., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC, and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLN or HURA?
XCLN holds 104 securities, while HURA holds 34. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCLN and HURA
Clean Energy ETFs Gain Momentum Amid Hormuz Crisis
Rising oil and gas volatility is pushing investors back toward clean energy ETFs.
Posted on 5/29/2026 by Kyle Anthony inEnergy
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.