VS
Compare iShares Global Clean Energy Index ETF (XCLN) vs Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XCLN provides Industrials, Utilities, and Technology exposures, while HURA is primarily weighted in Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.99% for HURA. Performance-wise, XCLN has returned 8.13% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas HURA is at 3.01% with +$68 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XCLN
HURA
| AuM | $27.19 M | $216.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.54% | -0.92% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XCLN | -6.46% | -24.42% | +8.13% | +24.78% | +16.43% |
HURA | +5.31% | -9.43% | +3.01% | +9.84% | +82.84% | |
| Flows | XCLN | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$12 M | +$15 M | +$21 M |
HURA | +$18 M | +$27 M | +$68 M | +$90 M | +$106 M |
XCLN vs HURA exposure
Countries
XCLN
USA
36.38%
China
22.47%
Other
41.15%
HURA
Canada
47.82%
USA
17.65%
Kazakhstan
17.09%
Other
17.44%
Sectors
XCLN
Industrials
48.54%
Utilities
41.86%
Technology
7.33%
HURA
Energy
58.31%
Non-Corporate
16.90%
Industrials
10.82%
Other
13.97%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XCLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.93%
First Solar, Inc.
7.86%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.56%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.98%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.71%
EDP SA
2.69%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.48%
HURA
Cameco Corp.
20.96%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
17.09%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
16.90%
Oklo, Inc.
6.07%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.99%
Yellow Cake Plc
5.28%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.64%
Centrus Energy Corp.
3.10%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.53%
Diversification
XCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
49.72%
HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 33 total
85.54%
Characteristics
Compare
XCLN
HURA
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD | Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.95% | 0.09% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | April 26, 2022 | May 16, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XCLN and HURA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XCLN or HURA?
As of September 3, 2026, XCLN has returned 8.13% year to date, while HURA has returned 3.01%. XCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XCLN or HURA?
As of September 3, 2026, XCLN manages $27.19 M in assets, while HURA manages $216.47 M. HURA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XCLN and HURA managed?
XCLN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index Net Composite - CAD benchmark. HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XCLN and HURA emphasize?
XCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. HURA is most exposed to Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XCLN or HURA?
Year to date, XCLN has seen +$12.37 M in net flows, compared with +$68.22 M for HURA. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XCLN and HURA compare?
XCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of XCLN and HURA?
XCLN's largest holdings include China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc., and Nextpower, Inc.. HURA's top holdings include Cameco Corp., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC, and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.
Which ETF is more diversified: XCLN or HURA?
XCLN holds 103 securities, while HURA holds 33. On holdings count, XCLN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XCLN and HURA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.