XEF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Full XEF fund page
VS
EAFX
Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full EAFX fund page

Compare iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) vs Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF (EAFX) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEF and EAFX provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XEF features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.2% for EAFX. Performance-wise, XEF has returned 10.69% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas EAFX is at 7.37% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%May 4May 11May 19May 26Jun 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEF
+5.46%+6.26%+10.69%+23.31%+64.80%
EAFX
+1.69%+3.98%+7.37%+19.23%-
Flows
XEF
+$464 M+$1,546 M+$3,196 M+$6,305 M+$10,148 M
EAFX
+$1 M+$15 M+$28 M+$45 M-

XEF vs EAFX exposure

Countries

XEF
Japan
24.72%
United Kingdom
13.85%
Switzerland
8.56%
France
8.29%
Germany
8.26%
Australia
7.14%
Other
29.19%
EAFX
Japan
24.77%
United Kingdom
13.83%
Switzerland
8.59%
France
8.30%
Germany
8.28%
Australia
7.14%
Other
29.09%

Sectors

XEF
Financials
21.98%
Industrials
19.21%
Information Technology
9.35%
Consumer Discretionary
8.38%
Health Care
7.01%
Other
34.06%
EAFX
Financials
22.00%
Industrials
19.26%
Information Technology
9.40%
Consumer Discretionary
8.45%
Health Care
7.01%
Other
33.89%
As of June 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEF
ASML HOLDING
2.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.24%
ASTRAZENECA
1.17%
CH1499059983
1.13%
NOVARTIS
1.11%
NESTLE SA
1.03%
SHELL PLC
1.02%
SIEMENS
0.89%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.83%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.80%
EAFX
ASML HOLDING
2.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.25%
ASTRAZENECA
1.16%
CH1499059983
1.13%
NOVARTIS
1.12%
NESTLE SA
1.03%
SHELL PLC
1.02%
SIEMENS
0.89%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.83%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.80%

Diversification

XEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,646 total
11.43%
EAFX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,613 total
11.44%

Characteristics

Compare
XEF
EAFX
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CADMSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.21%2.58%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 10, 2013May 15, 2024

Frequently asked questions about XEF and EAFX

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEF or EAFX?
As of June 4, 2026, XEF has returned 10.69% year to date, while EAFX has returned 7.37%. XEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEF or EAFX?
As of June 4, 2026, XEF manages $21.58 B in assets, while EAFX manages $172.61 M. XEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEF and EAFX managed?
XEF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. EAFX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XEF and EAFX emphasize?
XEF is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. EAFX is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEF or EAFX?
Year to date, XEF has seen +$3,196.21 M in net flows, compared with +$28.44 M for EAFX. XEF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEF and EAFX compare?
XEF has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while EAFX has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of XEF and EAFX?
XEF's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS. EAFX's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEF or EAFX?
XEF holds 2464 securities, while EAFX holds 2438. On holdings count, XEF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEF and EAFX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds