VS
iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while CAGE leans towards Finance, Technology, and Energy. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.28% for CAGE. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CAGE
| AuM | $22,329.14 M | $975.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | -1.41% | +2.68% | +14.79% | +20.00% | +79.80% |
CAGE | -1.66% | +4.39% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$1,135 M | +$3,086 M | +$8,058 M | +$9,883 M | +$15,910 M |
CAGE | +$128 M | +$388 M | - | - | - |
XEQT vs CAGE exposure
Countries
XEQT
USA
44.48%
Canada
24.66%
Other
30.86%
CAGE
USA
43.25%
Canada
28.71%
Other
28.04%
Sectors
XEQT
Finance
25.23%
Technology
24.35%
Industrials
10.32%
Non-Energy Materials
7.46%
Energy
7.10%
Other
25.54%
CAGE
Finance
25.48%
Technology
18.33%
Energy
10.91%
Industrials
10.60%
Non-Energy Materials
10.35%
Other
24.34%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.94%
Microsoft Corp.
2.08%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.43%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.22%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Shopify, Inc.
1.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.98%
CAGE
Royal Bank of Canada
2.12%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.04%
Apple, Inc.
1.98%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.54%
Microsoft Corp.
1.48%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.47%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
0.88%
Bank of Montreal
0.87%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
0.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
0.85%
Diversification
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,298 total
17.37%
CAGE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,200 total
14.09%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CAGE
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CAGE?
As of September 10, 2026, XEQT manages $22.33 B in assets, while CAGE manages $975.48 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CAGE managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CAGE is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XEQT and CAGE emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. CAGE is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Energy.
How do the fees of XEQT and CAGE compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while CAGE has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and CAGE?
XEQT's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CAGE's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, NVIDIA Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or CAGE?
XEQT holds 8200 securities, while CAGE holds 7165. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEQT and CAGE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.