XGI
iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF

Full XGI fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XGI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials and Information Technology, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, XGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XGI has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 23.88% with -$1,116 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XGI
-0.92%+2.49%+10.86%+21.18%+67.77%
ZEB
+7.80%+20.31%+23.88%+66.43%+145.04%
Flows
XGI
+$5 M-$3 M+$10 M+$18 M+$50 M
ZEB
-$85 M-$309 M-$1,116 M-$946 M-$1,896 M

XGI vs ZEB exposure

Countries

XGI
USA
51.03%
Japan
13.80%
Other
35.17%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

XGI
Industrials
91.68%
Other
8.32%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XGI
CATERPILLAR
4.15%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
3.05%
US36828A1016
2.93%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
2.37%
SIEMENS
2.19%
BOEING U
1.80%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.71%
EATON CORP PLC
1.69%
UNION PACIFIC U
1.60%
ABB
1.56%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 213 total
23.05%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
XGI
ZEB
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.40%2.44%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 26, 2013October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about XGI and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XGI or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI has returned 10.86% year to date, while ZEB has returned 23.88%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XGI or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI manages $161.56 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.54 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XGI and ZEB managed?
XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XGI and ZEB emphasize?
XGI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XGI or ZEB?
Year to date, XGI has seen +$10.02 M in net flows, compared with -$1,115.72 M for ZEB. XGI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XGI and ZEB compare?
XGI has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XGI and ZEB?
XGI's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XGI or ZEB?
XGI holds 197 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XGI and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds