VS
Compare iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) vs CI Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (CHCL.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XHC and CHCL.B provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, XHC features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.35% for CHCL.B. Performance-wise, XHC has returned 1.14% year-to-date with -$63 M in net flows, whereas CHCL.B is at 1.05% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XHC
CHCL.B
| AuM | $491.71 M | $87.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.37% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHC | +6.47% | +0.19% | -1.14% | +10.26% | +13.40% |
CHCL.B | +7.89% | +3.13% | +1.05% | +14.91% | +24.40% | |
| Flows | XHC | -$20 M | -$45 M | -$63 M | -$27 M | -$110 M |
CHCL.B | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$2 M | -$61 M | -$128 M |
XHC vs CHCL.B exposure
Countries
XHC
USA
68.08%
Switzerland
10.40%
Other
21.52%
CHCL.B
USA
70.55%
Switzerland
9.44%
Other
20.01%
Sectors
XHC
Health Care
89.82%
Other
8.80%
CHCL.B
Health Care
90.18%
Other
8.12%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XHC
LILLY
9.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.24%
ABBVIE
4.88%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.49%
ASTRAZENECA
3.93%
CH1499059983
3.82%
NOVARTIS
3.77%
MERCK & CO INC
3.62%
AMGEN-T
2.49%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.41%
CHCL.B
LILLY
9.93%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
6.96%
ABBVIE
4.72%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.21%
CH1499059983
3.60%
ASTRAZENECA
3.57%
NOVARTIS
3.54%
MERCK & CO INC
3.41%
AMGEN-T
2.34%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.26%
Diversification
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
46.33%
CHCL.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 149 total
44.52%
Characteristics
Compare
XHC
CHCL.B
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Developed Markets Healthcare 150 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.90% | 1.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 12, 2011 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XHC and CHCL.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XHC or CHCL.B?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC has returned -1.14% year to date, while CHCL.B has returned 1.05%. CHCL.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XHC or CHCL.B?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC manages $491.71 M in assets, while CHCL.B manages $87.26 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XHC and CHCL.B managed?
XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CHCL.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive Developed Markets Healthcare 150 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XHC and CHCL.B emphasize?
XHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. CHCL.B is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XHC or CHCL.B?
Year to date, XHC has seen -$63.06 M in net flows, compared with -$1.99 M for CHCL.B. CHCL.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XHC and CHCL.B compare?
XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while CHCL.B has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of XHC and CHCL.B?
XHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. CHCL.B's top holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHC or CHCL.B?
XHC holds 102 securities, while CHCL.B holds 137. On holdings count, CHCL.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XHC and CHCL.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.