VS
Compare iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ) vs CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQQ and QQC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XQQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.2% for QQC. Performance-wise, XQQ has returned 13.84% year-to-date with +$609 M in net flows, whereas QQC is at 17.74% with +$630 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQQ
QQC
| AuM | $5,450.92 M | $2,252.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQQ | -2.15% | -5.28% | +13.84% | +23.20% | +80.58% |
QQC | -2.81% | -4.13% | +17.74% | +26.38% | +95.35% | |
| Flows | XQQ | +$38 M | +$109 M | +$609 M | +$675 M | +$1,175 M |
QQC | +$67 M | +$319 M | +$630 M | +$813 M | +$1,557 M |
XQQ vs QQC exposure
Countries
XQQ
USA
92.46%
Other
7.54%
QQC
USA
93.42%
Sectors
XQQ
Technology
67.05%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.88%
Other
21.07%
QQC
Technology
66.64%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
20.96%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQQ
Apple, Inc.
8.07%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.78%
Microsoft Corp.
5.52%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.49%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.18%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.20%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.63%
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Diversification
XQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.50%
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
Characteristics
Compare
XQQ
QQC
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.22% | 0.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 3, 2011 | May 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XQQ and QQC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQQ or QQC?
As of September 2, 2026, XQQ has returned 13.84% year to date, while QQC has returned 17.74%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQQ or QQC?
As of September 2, 2026, XQQ manages $5.45 B in assets, while QQC manages $2.25 B. XQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQQ and QQC managed?
XQQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XQQ and QQC emphasize?
XQQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQQ or QQC?
Year to date, XQQ has seen +$609.46 M in net flows, compared with +$630.24 M for QQC. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQQ and QQC compare?
XQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of XQQ and QQC?
XQQ's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQC's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XQQ or QQC?
XQQ holds 100 securities, while QQC holds 100. On holdings count, XQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XQQ and QQC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.