VS
Compare iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU) vs CI Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XQQU and QQC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XQQU features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.2% for QQC. Performance-wise, XQQU has returned 16.68% year-to-date with +$30 M in net flows, whereas QQC is at 17.32% with +$641 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XQQU
QQC
| AuM | $191.01 M | $2,255.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XQQU | -2.98% | -3.73% | +16.68% | +21.07% | +105.18% |
QQC | -2.64% | -3.30% | +17.32% | +21.78% | +99.36% | |
| Flows | XQQU | +$3 M | +$5 M | +$30 M | +$14 M | +$136 M |
QQC | +$53 M | +$261 M | +$641 M | +$816 M | +$1,567 M |
XQQU vs QQC exposure
Countries
XQQU
USA
94.34%
QQC
USA
94.31%
Sectors
XQQU
Technology
67.72%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.02%
Other
20.26%
QQC
Technology
66.49%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.41%
Other
21.10%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XQQU
Apple, Inc.
8.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.87%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
3.07%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.66%
QQC
Apple, Inc.
8.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.93%
Microsoft Corp.
5.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.20%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.99%
Diversification
XQQU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
46.04%
QQC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
45.54%
Characteristics
Compare
XQQU
QQC
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.23% | 0.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | May 26, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XQQU and QQC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XQQU or QQC?
As of September 16, 2026, XQQU has returned 16.68% year to date, while QQC has returned 17.32%. QQC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XQQU or QQC?
As of September 16, 2026, XQQU manages $191.01 M in assets, while QQC manages $2.26 B. QQC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XQQU and QQC managed?
XQQU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. QQC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XQQU and QQC emphasize?
XQQU is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. QQC is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XQQU or QQC?
Year to date, XQQU has seen +$29.82 M in net flows, compared with +$641.33 M for QQC. QQC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XQQU and QQC compare?
XQQU has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while QQC has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of XQQU and QQC?
XQQU's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. QQC's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XQQU or QQC?
XQQU holds 102 securities, while QQC holds 102. On holdings count, XQQU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XQQU and QQC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.