VS
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XUSF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Business Services, while CGR leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, XUSF features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.65% for CGR. Performance-wise, XUSF has returned 10.9% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas CGR is at 11.17% with +$41 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSF
CGR
| AuM | $67.38 M | $303.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.57% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSF | +7.56% | +1.73% | +10.90% | +13.07% | +85.24% |
CGR | +7.51% | -2.12% | +11.17% | +8.98% | +39.59% | |
| Flows | XUSF | -$1 M | -$1 M | +$10 M | +$12 M | +$55 M |
CGR | +$8 M | +$14 M | +$41 M | +$41 M | +$60 M |
XUSF vs CGR exposure
Countries
XUSF
USA
96.57%
CGR
USA
67.32%
Japan
9.07%
Other
23.60%
Sectors
XUSF
Finance
95.61%
CGR
Finance
99.47%
As of November 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSF
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
12.31%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
11.68%
Visa, Inc.
8.13%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.92%
Bank of America Corp.
4.70%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
3.48%
Wells Fargo & Co.
3.21%
Morgan Stanley
2.98%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.88%
American Express Co.
2.13%
CGR
Welltower, Inc.
4.24%
Equinix, Inc.
4.23%
American Tower Corp.
4.14%
Prologis, Inc.
4.04%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
3.95%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
3.93%
Equity Residential
3.90%
Ventas, Inc.
3.82%
Realty Income Corp.
3.79%
Public Storage
3.76%
Diversification
XUSF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 76 total
57.42%
CGR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
39.81%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSF
CGR
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Financials Select Sector Index - CAD | Cohen & Steers Global Realty Majors Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | 2.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2023 | August 26, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSF and CGR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSF or CGR?
As of November 4, 2026, XUSF has returned 10.90% year to date, while CGR has returned 11.17%. CGR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSF or CGR?
As of November 4, 2026, XUSF manages $67.38 M in assets, while CGR manages $303.30 M. CGR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSF and CGR managed?
XUSF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Financials Select Sector Index - CAD benchmark. CGR is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Cohen & Steers Global Realty Majors Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSF and CGR emphasize?
XUSF is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Business Services. CGR is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSF or CGR?
Year to date, XUSF has seen +$9.89 M in net flows, compared with +$41.48 M for CGR. CGR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSF and CGR compare?
XUSF has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while CGR has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of XUSF and CGR?
XUSF's largest holdings include Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Visa, Inc.. CGR's top holdings include Welltower, Inc., Equinix, Inc., and American Tower Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSF or CGR?
XUSF holds 76 securities, while CGR holds 75. On holdings count, XUSF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUSF and CGR
Build Canada Homes: A Boost for Real Estate ETFs?
The Canadian government's $26B prefab housing plan and a U.S. tariff ruling have injected optimism into real estate markets, with analysts anticipating gains for REITs and construction-focused funds.
Posted on 6/2/2025 by Edouard Caillieux inReal Estate
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.