XUSF
iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF

Full XUSF fund page
VS
CONY
Harvest Coinbase High Income Shares ETF

Full CONY fund page

iShares S&P U.S. Financials Index ETF (XUSF) and Harvest Coinbase High Income Shares ETF (CONY) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XUSF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Business Services, while CONY leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, XUSF features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.4% for CONY. Performance-wise, XUSF has returned 4.9% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas CONY is at 4.25% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0102030%Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XUSF
-2.51%+3.79%+4.90%+5.99%+77.76%
CONY
+31.39%+22.22%-4.25%-33.16%-
Flows
XUSF
+$0 M-$1 M+$11 M+$13 M+$58 M
CONY
+$0 M+$0 M+$6 M+$9 M-

XUSF vs CONY exposure

Countries

XUSF
USA
96.27%
CONY
USA
100.47%

Sectors

XUSF
Finance
95.59%
CONY
Finance
100.47%
As of September 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XUSF
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
11.67%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
11.60%
Visa, Inc.
7.55%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.78%
Bank of America Corp.
5.00%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
3.76%
Wells Fargo & Co.
3.25%
Morgan Stanley
3.13%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.80%
American Express Co.
2.23%
CONY
Coinbase Global, Inc.
100.47%

Diversification

XUSF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 76 total
56.76%
CONY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.47%

Characteristics

Compare
XUSF
CONY
ProvideriSharesHarvest Portfolios Group
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P Financials Select Sector Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.86%45.32%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 6, 2023January 16, 2025

Frequently asked questions about XUSF and CONY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSF or CONY?
As of September 18, 2026, XUSF has returned 4.90% year to date, while CONY has returned -4.25%. XUSF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSF or CONY?
As of September 18, 2026, XUSF manages $64.78 M in assets, while CONY manages $14.56 M. XUSF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSF and CONY managed?
XUSF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Financials Select Sector Index - CAD benchmark. CONY is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XUSF and CONY emphasize?
XUSF is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Business Services. CONY is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSF or CONY?
Year to date, XUSF has seen +$10.73 M in net flows, compared with +$5.63 M for CONY. XUSF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSF and CONY compare?
XUSF has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while CONY has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of XUSF and CONY?
XUSF's largest holdings include JPMorgan Chase & Co., Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., and Visa, Inc.. CONY's top holdings include Coinbase Global, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSF or CONY?
XUSF holds 76 securities, while CONY holds 1. On holdings count, XUSF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XUSF and CONY

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds