VS
When evaluating costs, YAMZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, YAMZ has returned 8.65% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 12.41% with +$10 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
YAMZ
XEQT
| AuM | $109.71 M | $23,528.08 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.72% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | YAMZ | +4.08% | -4.10% | +8.65% | -0.57% | +110.55% |
XEQT | -4.21% | -3.34% | +12.41% | +14.07% | +79.74% | |
| Flows | YAMZ | +$3 M | +$2 M | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$62 M |
XEQT | +$1,138 M | +$2,986 M | +$9,811 M | +$10,645 M | +$17,548 M |
YAMZ vs XEQT exposure
Countries
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
YAMZ
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
YAMZ
XEQT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 11.39% | 1.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 14, 2022 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about YAMZ and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: YAMZ or XEQT?
As of November 5, 2026, YAMZ has returned 8.65% year to date, while XEQT has returned 12.41%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: YAMZ or XEQT?
As of November 5, 2026, YAMZ manages $109.71 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.53 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are YAMZ and XEQT managed?
YAMZ is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: YAMZ or XEQT?
Year to date, YAMZ has seen -$1.01 M in net flows, compared with +$9,810.92 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of YAMZ and XEQT compare?
YAMZ has an expense ratio of 1.72%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about YAMZ and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.