VS
When evaluating costs, YTSL features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.65% for UMAX. Performance-wise, YTSL has returned 10.52% year-to-date with +$204 M in net flows, whereas UMAX is at 9.51% with +$474 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
YTSL
UMAX
| AuM | $427.92 M | $1,474.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.65% | 0.77% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | YTSL | +6.02% | +23.05% | -10.52% | -10.30% | +76.95% |
UMAX | +7.65% | +2.03% | +9.51% | +9.43% | +33.15% | |
| Flows | YTSL | -$40 M | -$33 M | +$204 M | +$213 M | +$394 M |
UMAX | -$26 M | +$38 M | +$474 M | +$539 M | +$1,436 M |
YTSL vs UMAX exposure
Countries
YTSL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
YTSL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
YTSL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
YTSL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
YTSL
UMAX
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 35.50% | 13.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 14, 2022 | June 14, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about YTSL and UMAX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: YTSL or UMAX?
As of November 11, 2026, YTSL has returned -10.52% year to date, while UMAX has returned 9.51%. UMAX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: YTSL or UMAX?
As of November 11, 2026, YTSL manages $427.92 M in assets, while UMAX manages $1.47 B. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are YTSL and UMAX managed?
YTSL is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: YTSL or UMAX?
Year to date, YTSL has seen +$204.04 M in net flows, compared with +$473.85 M for UMAX. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of YTSL and UMAX compare?
YTSL has an expense ratio of 1.65%, while UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.77%.
Recent articles about YTSL and UMAX
Tesla ETFs Plunge as EV Funds Show Resilience Amid Stock Rout
Tesla’s sharp stock decline is hitting TSLA-focused ETFs hard, with year-to-date losses exceeding 40%. Meanwhile, diversified EV and Future Mobility ETFs are proving more resilient, highlighting shifting investor sentiment.
Posted on 3/17/2025 by Edouard Caillieux inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.