VS
BMO U.S. All Cap Equity Fund ETF (ZACE) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FLUS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZACE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary, while FLUS leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, ZACE features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for FLUS. Performance-wise, ZACE has returned 9.16% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas FLUS is at 13.52% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZACE
FLUS
| AuM | $57.41 M | $137.18 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.81% | 0.29% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.06% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZACE | +3.36% | +12.69% | +9.16% | +25.61% | +88.29% |
FLUS | +3.39% | +13.41% | +13.52% | +29.94% | +89.98% | |
| Flows | ZACE | +$0 M | -$5 M | -$7 M | -$5 M | +$26 M |
FLUS | +$0 M | +$12 M | +$12 M | +$33 M | +$43 M |
ZACE vs FLUS exposure
Countries
ZACE
USA
92.05%
Other
7.95%
FLUS
USA
97.06%
Sectors
ZACE
Information Technology
33.83%
Industrials
10.59%
Consumer Discretionary
10.32%
Communication Services
10.26%
Financials
9.24%
Health Care
7.62%
Other
18.14%
FLUS
Information Technology
32.48%
Communication Services
11.65%
Consumer Discretionary
11.43%
Health Care
10.37%
Financials
9.95%
Industrials
9.80%
Other
14.31%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZACE
APPLE
8.16%
MICROSOFT-T
5.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.98%
NVIDIA
4.61%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.47%
VISA INCORPORATION
3.12%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.77%
BK OF AMERICA CO
2.41%
ORACLE SYS
2.22%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
2.08%
FLUS
NVIDIA
7.59%
APPLE
6.90%
MICROSOFT-T
4.62%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.99%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.22%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.17%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.03%
META PLATFORMS
2.29%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.63%
CATERPILLAR
1.58%
Diversification
ZACE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 56 total
39.10%
FLUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 209 total
38.02%
Characteristics
Compare
ZACE
FLUS
| Provider | BMO | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2021 | May 6, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about ZACE and FLUS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZACE or FLUS?
As of June 11, 2026, ZACE has returned 9.16% year to date, while FLUS has returned 13.52%. FLUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZACE or FLUS?
As of June 11, 2026, ZACE manages $57.41 M in assets, while FLUS manages $137.18 M. FLUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZACE and FLUS managed?
ZACE is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. FLUS is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZACE and FLUS emphasize?
ZACE is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary. FLUS is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZACE or FLUS?
Year to date, ZACE has seen -$6.76 M in net flows, compared with +$11.74 M for FLUS. FLUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZACE and FLUS compare?
ZACE has an expense ratio of 0.81%, while FLUS has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of ZACE and FLUS?
ZACE's largest holdings include APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FLUS's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZACE or FLUS?
ZACE holds 53 securities, while FLUS holds 201. On holdings count, FLUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZACE and FLUS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.