VS
Compare BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN) vs Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZCLN provides Industrials, Utilities, and Technology exposures, while HURA is primarily weighted in Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.99% for HURA. Performance-wise, ZCLN has returned 14.78% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas HURA is at 9.97% with +$49 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZCLN
HURA
| AuM | $79.51 M | $172.03 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.93% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZCLN | -11.07% | -2.50% | +14.78% | +41.60% | +7.00% |
HURA | -15.70% | -27.00% | -9.97% | +0.98% | +99.96% | |
| Flows | ZCLN | +$1 M | +$9 M | +$12 M | +$3 M | -$1 M |
HURA | +$5 M | +$21 M | +$49 M | +$73 M | +$87 M |
ZCLN vs HURA exposure
Countries
ZCLN
USA
46.31%
China
18.40%
Other
35.29%
HURA
Canada
47.78%
USA
21.17%
Kazakhstan
15.12%
Other
15.93%
Sectors
ZCLN
Industrials
57.21%
Utilities
31.99%
Technology
9.34%
HURA
Energy
57.92%
Non-Corporate
14.78%
Industrials
11.00%
Utilities
8.43%
Other
7.87%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZCLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
12.47%
First Solar, Inc.
9.55%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.45%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.08%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.25%
Plug Power, Inc.
3.83%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.93%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
2.67%
Equatorial SA
2.28%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.16%
HURA
Cameco Corp.
21.98%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
15.12%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.78%
Oklo, Inc.
8.43%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.09%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.37%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.42%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.95%
NuScale Power Corp.
2.89%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.57%
Diversification
ZCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 103 total
54.67%
HURA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
84.60%
Characteristics
Compare
ZCLN
HURA
| Provider | BMO | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index - USD | Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.51% | 0.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | January 26, 2020 | May 16, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ZCLN and HURA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZCLN or HURA?
As of July 17, 2026, ZCLN has returned 14.78% year to date, while HURA has returned -9.97%. ZCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZCLN or HURA?
As of July 17, 2026, ZCLN manages $79.51 M in assets, while HURA manages $172.03 M. HURA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZCLN and HURA managed?
ZCLN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index - USD benchmark. HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZCLN and HURA emphasize?
ZCLN is most exposed to Industrials, Utilities, and Technology. HURA is most exposed to Energy, Non-Corporate, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZCLN or HURA?
Year to date, ZCLN has seen +$12.30 M in net flows, compared with +$48.70 M for HURA. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZCLN and HURA compare?
ZCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of ZCLN and HURA?
ZCLN's largest holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc., and Nextpower, Inc.. HURA's top holdings include Cameco Corp., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC, and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZCLN or HURA?
ZCLN holds 103 securities, while HURA holds 34. On holdings count, ZCLN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZCLN and HURA
Clean Energy ETFs Gain Momentum Amid Hormuz Crisis
Rising oil and gas volatility is pushing investors back toward clean energy ETFs.
Posted on 5/29/2026 by Kyle Anthony inEnergy
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.